June 2, 2009
Posted by Stewart in All posts.add a comment
I’ve heard it said, ‘Do not let what cannot do prevent you from doing what you can.’ It is an interesting idea, for how often have I allowed my sheer disappointment and frustration at what I could not immediately comprehend overcome my determination to do that which I could? Am I morally excused for my inaction simply because it is psychologically significant that I felt so helpless? I would suggest, no. It is a thought worth exploring further…
The Thought Journal March 14, 2009
Posted by Stewart in All posts.Tags: journal, thought, thought journal
add a comment
I have elected to begin a thought journal. The purpose of this endeavor is both simple and clear – to record the ideas that are deemed valuable and relevant as they flow through the stream of one’s consciousness; to communicate these ideas expressively in written format for further meditation and perhaps even public discussion; and to reflect upon the content of thought itself as it circulates throughout the psyche, analyzing it critically so as to broaden the horizon of understanding within the scope of clarity.
I acknowledge the observation of early psychologist William James who regarded consciousness as a flowing stream of the perceptions and thoughts one was aware of at that respective moment. James suggested that this stream retained no gaps, and that correspondingly every image was blended in with the one preceding it and the one succeeding it in a continuous flow of information. The content of a thought journal, therefore, may be regarded as random, continuous and changing as that stream itself, wherein perceptions are blended, and there are no clear gaps between where one ends and another begins. In that sense, the text of it may appear to be random, jumping from topic to topic, and branching ever outwards from the concrete to the abstract and back again. It is not organized, therefore, by an conventional pattern or order of essay, but is instead free from such restraints so that it may limitlessly explore the mind itself.
This thought journal is not some brilliant or radical new idea. It is a simple one, that has in all probability been a practiced form of note-taking for many. Some have taken it to the organised end of journaling, wherein a distinction between it and an ordinary journal is made. For in most ordinary journals there is a progressive flow that can be logically followed from topic to topic; whereas a thought journal, as continuous and changing as that stream we call consciousness, is bound to no such order. It is unlikely then that many who read such a journal will derive a full sense of the meaning of the various diverse ideas explored on a single page alone; for in only a page the topics presented could be so random as thinking one word and then randomly thinking of another and progressing so on.
If such a journal would take the semblance of chaotic disorganization, then why would anyone elect to write such a thing? Apart from the rationale stated at the beginning, it is a form of introspection in itself, and it assures that ultimately one’s ideas or observations are not lost in the abyss of forgotten memory, but they are given a form, even if only written form, so that the idea may outlive the mind that bore it at a single point in time, so that ultimately the idea may be contemplated further and deeper. It is a form of personal investigation that examines the content of thought itself.
Practically, what does this all mean? Quite simply, one takes a blank book and fills its pages with whatever thoughts deemed relevant that enter the realm of awareness. To expand the process further, one may even begin to analyze the content of the idea that has entered awareness, and record a critical evaluation of it, pondering deeply its meaning and implication, its strengths and limitations, and perhaps even its origin in one’s experience of life and existence. Through this, critical cognition is practiced, and one discovers many fruitful insights from the depth and breadth of contemplation, and so the horizons of understanding are broadened.
Anger December 30, 2008
Posted by Stewart in All posts.Tags: anger, emotion, rage, suppression
1 comment so far
Anger is a powerful emotion, denoting a strong feeling of displeasure or hostility towards something or someone. Long ago, a wise old man once told me that anger was a natural response to certain stimuli, but what is more important is how one deals with the anger and the way in which one expresses it. Does one master the anger or allow oneself to be mastered by it?
I have learned that it is not healthy (perhaps not even safe) to others or even oneself to compartmentalize an emotion as volatile as anger. One assumes that bottling up the feeling – suppressing it – will make it disappear. It does, but only temporarily, for the feeling still remains within you, stored, retained, hidden as if in some deep and dark vault, awaiting to somehow become manifest. Eventually the total culmunation of that suppressed anger bursts in a devastating and volatile explosion of rage – an incredible and powerful eruption of emotion that overcomes the faculty of reason whilst simultaneously draining both the body and the mind of its energy. Rationality becomes irrelevant, as one is overcome almost entirely by the turbulent wave of all that pent-up emotion rising to the surface to be released. The consequences of this, socially and emotionally, can be destructive.
Carpe diem November 28, 2008
Posted by Stewart in All posts.add a comment
“You have live in the present. With no regrets of the past and no fear of the future. Otherwise you miss perfect moments in the present.” That was the advice Ashleigh gave to me just a moment ago in response to my time urgency. Her advice calls one to live in the present, to act in the moment. It is not a call to neglect the future and squander one’s resources on fleeting pleasures and extravagance to offer temporal satisfaction in the present. To believe that her advice implied thus is to misinterpret it or to understand it too simplistically. Instead, Ashleigh’s advice represents a wider call to act now in the time that one has. Tolkien advised this also through the character of Gandalf in The Lord of the Rings; “All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to us.”
Do you ever wish you could do something meaningful with your life? If one takes Ashleigh’s advice, then perhaps the answer is to do something meaningful now. Now does not mean only this day and hour which shall come to pass and then never again; rather now means every day and every hour. For now is one’s life. If one acts with purpose in every moment of now then one has truly acted with meaning throughout their entire life. To quote Lloyd John Ogilvie: “Living each day as if it were out only day makes for a total life lived at full potential.”
Enacting something meaningful in the now does not necessarily have to be something large and grand. It is quite often the simplest of things, most often taken for granted, that are the most meaningful, and if performed in the now throughout one’s life – fill one’s life with meaning. Such simple things may include a smile to a stranger or even laughter among friends, or a kind word of comfort to someone in distress. In the words of Mother Teresa, “We can do no great things; only small things with great love.” In this understanding, therefore, the magnitude of the action, whether great or small, is less important than the purpose with which it is performed. A simple task, therefore, may be filled with valour, even if it is without renown. Regardless of magnitude, the action stands on its own merit.
On Superficiality November 26, 2008
Posted by Stewart in All posts.Tags: superficiality
add a comment
Superficiality describes formulating an understanding of something by examining only the surface of it, such as its outward appearance. Superficiality is thus characterised by the shallow processing of a stimulus according to its general features, and a lack of depth, which is an expression of its failure to provide a full or complete understanding or account of something.
We live in a culture that tends to emphasise the apparent importance of mere appearances, such as those of status, notoriety, money, power or position. These are the superficial images that form the facade of personality, and yet we often come to idolize these, vainly believing in the illusory hope that they are of some great value or worth, or that they shall perhaps fill our hearts and so provide enduring contentment to our existence. Pope Benedict XVI contemplated how one may idolize superficialities, stating in an address to a crowd in France:
“The word ‘idol’ comes from the Greek and means ‘image’, ‘figure’, ‘representation’, but also ‘ghost’, ‘phantom’, ‘vain appearance’. An idol is a delusion, for it turns its worshiper away from reality and places him in the kingdom of mere appearances. … Have not money, the thirst for possessions, for power and even for knowledge, diverted man from his true destiny?”
The question is quite clearly one of value and where one centers one’s existence. Is my existence founded upon truth or at the very least a search for truth, or is founded upon some fanciful fantasy – a reality that is precarious and deceptive by nature because it is centered in the realm of mere appearances. Appearances which, though enticing, may turn out to be false. Am I chasing a phantom?
Therein lies the ultimate failure of superficiality, that is, it rests upon the shallow processing of a stimulus according to its appearances, and thus it fails to look beyond the surface to process the content of a stimulus with any great depth of detail. The understanding generated from shallow processing is thus limited and based solely upon observed appearances of an object or subject’s surface.
An added problem that superficiality seems to generate is that sometimes it creates barriers. We sometimes use our earthly differences to build a wall, behind which we hide seeking an illusory sense of security. It is a form of isolationism that is challenging to break. But in breaking this isolationism and truly interacting and connecting with other human beings we find a common humanity on a deep level. This deep level can never be achieved by shallow processing, only by breaking free from centering our existence in the realm of appearances.
It is often said that one should not judge a book by its cover, rather by its content. Similarly, one should not judge an argument by its style, but by its substance. The logical extension of this, therefore, is that one should not judge a person by their mere appearances, but by the content of their character, as Martin Luther King Jr. would declare. Shattering superficiality is achieved, therefore, by deep processing that examines beyond the surface of something to see the character or nature behind it.
Before God, we are all stripped of our superficialities, of our outward appearances, whether they take the form of wealth, status, notoriety or power; we are stripped of them and all extravagances; the superficial facade of our personality crumbles in His presence so that only our innermost heart is revealed in the light of truth. God’s almighty gaze pierces through the surface of our character and touches the very core of our existence itself.
Failure October 30, 2008
Posted by Stewart in All posts.Tags: failure, success
add a comment
“For all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God.” – Romans 3:23
Failure. n. describes a lack or deficiency. Being human, we all fail sometimes and fall short of either our own expectations, others expectations or perhaps even both. Sometimes we simply fail to achieve the standards that we have set or standards for conduct that have been set for us. We are not perfect, we do fall short.
It may seem like a simple realisation of the obvious almost, but we often forget this. We tend to forget or to dismiss the fragility and frailty of our humanity in favour of a prideful delusion that we can attain perpetual success or perfection and lock this into a state of enduring stasis that shall be free of the dynamic winds of change and chance.
Despite our own failings, particular in character or conscience, it is often our attitude that determines the outcome. Do I acknowledge my error and learn from it? Or do I vainly persist in applying the error despite the truth of it being revealed? How we respond to failure – the attitude that we take to it – is influential upon whether we continue in the same pattern of cognition and behaviour, or whether we change our approach or understanding.
In a Christian context, we fail when we center our existence and reality outside communion with God, and so formulate our own fanciful fantasy reality. In contemplation, one may consider that to be the essence of sin itself, and it seems inescapable that we become caught up in these alternate realities, sometimes religious and sometimes secular, that promise us power, glory or a combination of both. In terms of morality, sin is perhaps when we center our choices and the content of our conscience outside the awareness or search for the truth
Sometimes we fear failure. We fear what falling short means to us. We fear that failure is a blight upon our sense of self-worth or perhaps an indication of our imperfection or lack of integrity or principle. Failure, therefore, can be very difficult and challenging to acknowledge. But with that acknowledgment there comes the requirement for resolve, for action in the direction of change. Quite simply, with the acknowledgment of failure comes the incidence of learning and the denial of willful ignorance.
What I have learned throughout the course of this year is that failure and success are not necessarily always separated from each other. There is a distinction between success and perfectionism. The attitude that success requires one to be consistently successful in all aspects and matters is false, and results in a perfectionistic orientation that is rigid and not open to adaptation or the acceptance of anything that falls short of the standard. Authentic success is not necessarily the absence of failure; it is the maintenance of passion, purpose and perseverance even in the face of adversity.
Irrational Hatred and a Common Humanity October 28, 2008
Posted by Stewart in All posts.Tags: common humanity, fear, irrational hatred, racism
add a comment
There was recently an incident of vandalism and slander at the school I study at, where unnamed perpetrators invaded the campus over night and smeared it with offensive graffiti, particularly anti-Semitic messages that specifically targeted a Jewish staff member. A massive swastika was painted upon the roof of the administration building, and various smaller variations upon other school property, along with accompanying text. The content of the text was not only anti-Semitic, but clearly directed toward a Jewish member of the community.
This act of vandalism and display of racial intolerance came as a particular shock given that only the day before the Principal of the college reflected on the responsible exercise of free choice at the final assembly. He implored the graduating class to enact responsible choices in their daily living and lifelong learning. The next day it appears his words were unheeded by some. It came as a dismal conclusion to a year of arduous teaching and study.
On that particular day I was actually late to arrive at school. To my surprise, classes were not resuming as normal, and there was a considerable amount of commotion, chaos almost – a sense of disorganisation and restlessness. Only at the emergency assembly was the true audacity of the crime revealed. Students and staff presented appropriate revulsion at this attack upon our community. I was disappointed, particularly for this event to mark the conclusion of secondary education for the class of 2008.
Gradually, however, my own upset and disappointment at this incident grew to a contemplation of the question of why. The answer to how seemed self-evident and obvious. But why was a more appropriate question. Why engage in such an activity that would not only damage the identity of a tenacious class and a leading college, but further attack an individual and a whole faith on the basis of their religious identity? The irrationality of such unfounded fear is further compounded by the fact that this religious identity did no harm to our community.
Some students at the College are presently studying the Holocaust of World War II, with reference to Elie Wiesel’s tragic and brilliantly moving memoir Night. The Jewish staff member whose office was slandered with the offensive graffiti commented that it was difficult to convey the relevance of the novella’s themes to the present generation. It is easy to assume that with the end of the war, hatred based on one’s identity was destroyed along with Nazism. The fact is that both ideas survived and continue to remain regardless of their apparent relevance to one’s own life. In an email response to this incident, he wrote that this attack potently illustrated the fact that irrational hatred did not end with the demise of the Nazi regime and the conclusion of WWII. “Apathy is the enemy” he exclaimed, quoting Edmund Burke: “All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.”
In response to this incident, students themselves took initiative by forming a pledge against unreasonable and unwarranted hatred based upon a person’s faith or identity. Many signatures were obtained upon the fabric cloth of the pledge which was hung upon the administration building – a banner for tolerance and in direct and contrasting opposition to the message of unfounded fear which drove those unnamed perpetrators to explicitly target a man for no better reason than his religious identity. Various other students approached the Jewish staff member with sincere apologies on behalf of the community, indicating that the anti-Semitic slurs spray-painted across his office are not representative of the attitudes of every member of our community, and the fact that such hateful speech will not be condoned.
The attitude of fear, extending into senseless hatred, was illustrated in the offensive slander that fell upon the school’s property. This assault upon the identity of a person and a community brought the notion of groundless hatred and fear into relevance in the lives of all members of the community. Apathy suddenly became complicity in the crime and ignorance, while being bliss, became unconscionable itself. How could anyone avoid it? It’s relevance had peaked in our own daily lives, demonstrating the fact that our assumptions were indeed false – unwarranted hatred and fear did not end with the fall of Hitler’s regime, it continues even today.
Contrasting this message of irrational hatred, students developing the pledge recognised something very deep and profound that holds relevance for every human person in every space and time. We are all individual human beings, and though diverse, we are united by our common humanity, regardless of our religious, social or political affiliations. This is our shared inheritance and it is something worthy of celebration, not slander. And so it is that the message of a common humanity and the dignity of every human person must triumph over the message of irrational hatred, which is itself founded upon fear.
I conclude this piece with a quote from civil rights activist Dr. Martin Luther King. Jr:
“We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly.”
Institutional Zeitgeist October 25, 2008
Posted by Stewart in All posts.Tags: change, energy, institutions, sustainable development, zeitgeist
add a comment
Various thoughts have circulated my psyche since watching the documentary film Zeitgeist: Addendum (2008), by Paul Joseph. Though I rigorously disagree with many of the film’s premises, I was interested and intrigued by its exploration of institutional power and its tendency towards profit and self-preservation, where self-sufficiency is considered unfavorable to the institution’s interests as its removes control of resources away from the institution and into the hands of the individual, thereby diminishing the relevance of the institution in society.
I pondered to myself: Where does the electricity that powers this computer come from? It comes from an energy corporation, one of many throughout the world’s college of corporate institutions. What we understand about such institutions is that they are profit-based, and hence oriented toward self-preservation. Energy independence, describing a source of energy that is beyond their control, is thus not favourable to the institution’s interests as it would threaten both its profits and relevance in society. This attitude of institutional self-preservation, one may postulate, is inhibitory to developing effective strategies that promote self-sufficiency, as it seeks to consolidate control over resources in the hands of institutional bodies. The general public, therefore, is rendered dependent upon these institutions to provide it with the resources and energy that it requires. If the public were self-sufficient, these institutions would loose all relevance in society.
Sustainable development describes the simultaneous occurrence of growth and the preservation of natural resources for future generations of humanity. Should self-sufficiency, that is, the energy independence of each household, be the goal of sustainable development? My theory is that self-sufficiency is a source of empowerment as one has control over one’s own resources, as compared to the institutionalised control of resources that is currently prevalent.
Just a contemplation.
I further agree with the film’s premise that “the most relevant change must occur first inside of you. The real revolution is the revolution of consciousness.” This notion reflects the understanding that authentic change begins from within and that permeates through a person’s character, enacted and modeled in their own example, and so encouraging others to follow. This form of authentic change is difficult and challenging to attain, uphold and permeate throughout one’s own life, but it is the truest change because it comes from the heart.
Contemplating Freedom and Responsibility October 15, 2008
Posted by Stewart in All posts.Tags: choice, freedom, responsibility
add a comment
In our present society, we possess a seemingly high degree of control over our daily lives, though this is not necessarily true in all cases and may be subject to scrutiny. That is freedom. Freedom is empowering, and with that power comes the responsibility to exercise it appropriately, by seeking to make choices that are informed by a cultivated awareness, or at the very least, a search for the truth of the matter, without which freedom, justice and responsibility would be stripped of their meaning and rendered as nothing more than mere words on a page.
OCD October 3, 2008
Posted by Stewart in All posts.Tags: anxiety, hope, mental illness, obsessive compulsive disorder, OCD, perfectionism, recovery
add a comment
Recent conversations have prompted me to consider how my experience of my mental illness has impacted the course of my life and how it has catalysed formations in character, conscience, my world view and my relationships with others.
Prior to my diagnosis of obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) in early 2005, my life seemed to follow a predictable pattern of consistency, almost totally undisturbed and undisrupted by outside forces. Unexpected surprises occurred rarely. I had control, or at least a sense of it, and in that way I felt highly powerful. I felt that I possessed the power to control the direction and course of my life in the manner I so intended. However, I was deluding myself if I thought that change would not come and that things would remain in enduring stasis.
In the early months of 2005, disorder erupted from a place I least expected – my mind. Numerous uncontrolled and uncontrollable thoughts circulating my psyche. I could not control these thoughts, and they distressed me for two precise reasons; their content was obscene and contradictory to my most cherished beliefs, and I could not control the direction of my own thinking. The notion that I could not control my thoughts completely disrupted my sense of control and sent me down a spiral of anxiety. I tried immensely, and yet in vain, to exercise control over the content and direction of my thoughts. I tried incredibly, and yet in vain, to control and organise the content of my mind. The fact that I could not order my psyche and command my thoughts caused me great grief, distress and anxiety. In order to establish order in my disordered mind, to reverse or redress the distressing thoughts and to gain some sense of control over my life I engaged in compulsive behaviour.
My compulsive behaviour was exceedingly exhausting – it drained and depleted my energy and resources, and was exceptionally time-consuming. Sometimes I would wash my hands for more than the usual amount of time that other people would do so, though this compulsion was only occasional. While studying I would tear a myriad of papers from my note-book, even after only having written a single word on each one. I would walk forward, then having experienced a distressing and uncontrollable thought, walk back to the point where I started and tread the same path again. I would walk in and out of rooms repeatedly, compulsively moving backwards and forwards. My muscles became tense. At one point I almost fainted for having tensed so much as to have stopped breathing for a short period. My speech became interrupted as I would frequently stop mid-sentence and then repeat the sentence from the beginning again. Sometimes I would simply scream or groan. My screams were either of no particular lingual comprehension, or I would declare that these thoughts were not my own. Unless others reaffirmed this declaration, my anxiety would only continue to heighten. All such measures were taken in order to exact some sense of control over the uncontrollable.
My behaviour became highly prominent and noticeable, that inexorably my family became deeply concerned over my yet unnamed and worsening condition. After one particular episode after which I was reduced to tears, I was offended at my father’s suggestion that I should seek clinical assistance. My pride seemed hindered at that moment as much as my already diminishing sense of control. Eventually, my family convinced me to consult with our physician. She was reluctant to definitively diagnose me, as psychiatry was not her specialty, but she believed that the condition governing my anxious state was obsessive compulsive disorder.
Having being well-acquainted with my family, our physician sought to find me the best available psychiatric treatment, which apparently happened to be in Colingwood. In clinical consultation with psychiatrist there, my diagnosis was determined to be OCD. I was placed on two sets of medication, which I was very reluctant to accept. I was skeptical as to the side-effects of the medication and in particular to the effect it would have on my cerebral chemistry. Despite these concerns, I still consumed the drugs, one of which was to help me to sleep, since at that time my anxiety disrupted my sleep cycle and I was exhausted.
I must thank my father at this point. Colingwood is a far distance from where we live, and every two weeks when my appointment was scheduled my father, who suffers from a spinal condition, would drive me to the consulting rooms. Despite his own medical condition and the significant pain that it caused him, my father devoted his energy and time to assuring that his son obtained treatment. It was a labour of love. It is not, however, the magnitude of the action that seemed important to me, but rather the simple intention, love and passion that he placed into it. Thanks Dad.
Despite having received psychoactive drugs and consulting with a psychiatrist who was apparently one of Melbourne’s finest, my condition continued to deteriorate. The anxiety intensified to such a point that I was unable to dress myself or even tie my own shoe-laces. The impact on my study became noticeable as my grades declined and my abscenes from school increased. At this point, as I spiraled further into anxiety, my family and particularly my father, believed that hospitalisation was necessary. I feared that suggestion for two reasons; one was that I was not very sociably at the time and I was aware that hospitals were social environments, another reason was my perception of what an institutionalized environment was like – white walls and sterility. This discomforted me further, as did the feeling that being hospitalized would indicate further the status of my lack of control over my life.
Consulting with my psychiatrist, two psychiatric nurses a mental health worker named Craig over the telephone, it was determined that the best course of action was clinical inpatient care. At approximately the middle of the year 2005, I was admitted into the Royal Children’s Hospital Banksia Unit on Mavis Street, Footscray.
My first day at Banksia was actually rather short. I arrived for admission only to discover that there were no available beds at the time. Instead, I was given a tour of the unit by one of the regular nurses, a Macedonian lady. My original perception of what a psychiatric unit is like was shattered. It was not the stereotype I expected. No white walls or sterile environment. It was a colourful, warm, cosy, modern, almost homely environment. There were two wings, the North and the South. I would later find that I was to be situated in the South wing. Where each wing met was the nurses station and the lounge, with couches and a television set. The kitchen was also not far from there and looked out onto the rolling grass outside. Outside, there was a basketball court and a pond in which there apparently lived a turtle, thought I never saw it. I went home that day only to return a few days after. Admittedly, I felt relieved to be going home.
On the day I was admitted, before I left home, I recall my grandmother weeping. The entire situation saddened her, and probably added to her worries. At that time she would remark how very few members of our family were in good health. My grandfather was ill, suffering from gout and cardiac problems. My father suffered from his spinal condition, and my grandmother herself was not ideal in health. Her grandson being hospitalised only further compounded her concerns. However, I must thank my dear baka. She comforted me in my most agonizing and tumultuous moments. Even though she could not fully understand the notion of a mental illness, her support remained unwavering and her voice was soft and gentle and her message of compassion came from the heart.
My grandfather, severely ill himself and frequently hospitalised, also did not understand fully, yet he could understand what it was like to be hospitalised and reflected that it was not a pleasant indication of one’s health. He empathized with me. During the night, neither of us could sleep. He could not sleep because of the excruciating pain of his condition; I because of the tumult in my mind. I must thank my dida for his support, which like my grandmother’s, was unwavering. Despite whether or not my grandmother and grandfather could understand the concepts that mental illness entailed, they could understand suffering, and so they could still emphasize and support me regardless of whatever insight into psychological disorders they lacked.
On the day I was actually admitted into the Banksia Unit as an inpatient, I was first placed in the High Dependency Unit (HDU), though I do not know why. While watching Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, one of the clinical psychologists spoke to me, though there were many awkward silences. I had spoken to a psychiatrist before, but this was the first time I had spoken to a psychologist. It seemed different, and I was uncomfortable with the situation. After she left, I was alone for some time, that was until a head peered through the door. His name was Peter. He was slightly shorter than me, his head shaven and a supporter of the Western Bulldogs in Australian Rules Football. He came in and sat with me in HDU and we watched the Potter film together. A year younger than me, he was the first patient that I had conversed extensively with and befriended.
Conversing with Peter and the many others I would meet in Banksia helped me to break through a social barrier of isolation. In vainly attempting to control my thoughts and organise my mind I had focused inwardly into the realm of psyche, and in doing so had isolated myself from the outside world. One of the psychologist’s at the unit observed this and remarked that I was not really connected with my sensory experience of the world, and was instead too inwardly focused into the mind and thought. I feared conversation and interaction with others. Slowly, however, through my many conversations with the people in Banksia, this isolationism began to crumble and so began the process of reconnecting my mind to my sensory experience.
While in the inpatient unit, my medication quantity was increased, and I was allocated to a particular psychologist. Her name was Lorraine. On our first consultation, we conversed extensively for well over the prescribed hour. Our successive consultations were within the prescribed time limits. During one particular session, a fire safety drill had occurred. We were unaware and so did not leave the consulting room. Despite the fact that the door of that room clearly indicated that people were inside, no one came to advise us to leave the room during the fire drill. If it were not a drill, Lorraine and I would have been left in our session while the fire consumed the unit. Lorraine was a wonderful psychologist. During our sessions, I gained profound insight into the nature of my condition. Insight, which another psychologist later remarked, was fundamental in my recovery.
There was a running program in the unit, much like a time-table, where an activity was allocated for each day to keep the inpatients socially, physically and emotionally active and contemplative. Included in the program was pilates, an art class, general class, several group sessions declaring with issues, and an outdoor excursion that occurred weekly. In the time that I was there, those excursions were to Williamstown for gelati and the aquarium where one of the nurses had mistaken an unknown man for me, much to her own embarrassment. I recall on that excursion to the aquarium, we participated in a wild simulator ride. Several of the people I had befriended screamed. I simply shut my eyes, rather than risk feeling physically ill at the swift hurling motions of the ride.
One particular group session, which I believe was called ‘Issues’, took my interest. Lorraine coordinated that group. I do not recall exactly what we were discussing, but one of the inpatients said something that engaged my curiosity. Perhaps we were talking about what meaning there is in life, and the girl’s response to it was along the lines of ’sex, drugs and rock and roll’, and getting pissed and smashed (ie: binge drinking). Though I did not say anything, I did not understand where such an answer could come from. It seemed very blunt to declare that the purpose of life was self-gratification. It even seemed to drain life of any meaning or purpose beyond the self. To this day I cannot understand that girl’s response, but I do not judge her for it, merely wonder why it is she thought thus.
While in Banksia, my family and I had at least two productive family therapy sessions, during which we discussed how my early family life and childhood had impacted upon my current state. My mother felt immense guilt after those sessions. During my early childhood, my mother was encouraged to ‘push’ me, so to speak, academically, since my grades were poor and I seemed to retain little of the content of the curriculum. That ‘pushing’ often resulting in evenings of frustration and tears, with my mother yelling and me suppressing my voice and my feelings deeply – bottling them up, confining them into some deep part of my psyche. I wanted to express anger, yet I did not. I suppressed my anger deep inside, thinking that perhaps it would go away. I forgave my mother, yet I still felt that she believed herself to be guilty. I understand that her intentions were pure still, and that she still does, even as she did then, want the best for her sons. Her support, along with my fathers, has been important in helping me to find the right treatment and to proceed in seeking recovery.
In Banksia, I met many wonderful people, many of whom I befriended. On my first day, I was less than socially inclined to engage a conversation. However, I was forced to defy my inhibitions when confronted by the warm welcome given to me by the in-patients with whom I sat at the kitchen table for lunch. Vittoria, whom was known as Vitty, was the first to speak to me, with a warm and welcoming tone. Her friend next to her, Ashleigh then joined the conversation, as did Elaine, and Peter whom I had previously met. Quite frankly, I did not expect to be received so kindly by strangers, but I was welcomed convivially and Vitty, Sami, Ashleigh and myself fast became friends. During our many conversations, I felt quite at ease to be with people who could perhaps understand my own condition because of their own experiences.
I had particularly developed a very close bond with Ashleigh. She was two years my senior, completing Year 11 and possessed a vibrant smile, gleaming eyes and dazzling red hair. We developed a fondness for each-other, one that was surely noticeably to both nurses and patients alike given that one of the nurses questioned whether Ashleigh and I would remain in contact after our discharge, and Amy’s comment that the rules declare that there are to be no romances in Banksia. Of course, the rule prescribed no romances in Banksia; it did not mention anything of romance beyond Banksia. I recall Robert, one of the most eccentric persons I had met, remarking that the sun would come out to shine when Ashleigh smiled. It did indeed feel that way to me.
Ashleigh would lay in my lap on the couch as we watched television together. We frequently played ‘Around the World’ on the basketball court outside, during which Ashleigh demonstrated her profound netball skills. She was able throw the ball through the hoop while standing with her back towards the ring. Our rooms were next to each other and so we would often knock the wall to each other during the evening. One evening, however, I heard soft cries coming from Ashleigh’s room. She was in tears. I came out to the hallway, not certain if it were here weeping that I could hear, but in those cries I could discern pain.
Another person whom I met in Banksia was Sarah. Sarah was short and thin and her skin was pale. She had a tube in her nose, whose function I did not know for some time. She was often silent and did not speak. If she did speak, it was never too loudly, but in a mild tone. At the beginning, I wondered, though I did not inquire, why Sarah was in Banksia. One evening I was to find out. We were sitting at the table, conversing convivially over dinner as Sarah sat in silence staring at her meal. She began to cry, and the conversation dissipated into a terrifying silence where naught could be heard but Sarah’s weeping. It was in this moment that I finally understood. Sarah suffered from anorexia. I was also soon to learn that Sarah had spent the longest time as an in-patient in the ward – some two years or longer. Since discharge from the unit, however, I have still maintained some contact with Sarah and was pleased to hear of her discharge from the unit also. Sarah had gone on to attain a professional qualification, in aged-care, and carried on with her treatment.
There was a particular episode though that highlighted for me a failure of either cultural understanding or the mental health system or both. Since discharge, Sarah had relapsed and was in a terrible situation in which she was contemplating suicide. I think she overdosed on some substance, though I am not sure of the details. Sarah bravely summoned the inner courage to seek emergency help, which she obtained. However, once hospitalised, she was told by a police officer that was ‘wasting’ a bed. I contemplated what would have been said or thought if Sarah had not sought help and died. No doubt that some would have inquired why, oh why, did she not seek help. Yet Sarah did seek help, only to receive it grudgingly with a comment that seems to suggest that she is unworthy or undeserving of help. I applaud and admire Sarah for her courage to continue her quest for recovery, despite comments such as those which seem to highlight a lack of cultural understanding towards those who suffer from mental afflictions.
A person suffering from any affliction, whether physical or mental, simply requires a person to reach out to them, to connect with and communicate with them, and to touch their lives. Sarah needed someone to open a window of understanding, to connect with her on a personally level and to communicate with genuine compassion. She did not need nor did she deserve to have the suggestion that she was wasting space. Any such a suggestion could perhaps exacerbate one’s feelings of worthlessness.
After two weeks of in-patient care, I had gained insight and the coping strategies and mechanisms to combat my condition. What I had learned is that often we engage in destructive behaviour simply to cope. Not all drug abusers are addicts because they simply love the drug. Some engage in destructive exercises and other extreme measures simply to cope and gain a sense of control. To improve health status in such a situation, one must be empowered with more efficient, non-destructive, coping strategies. I believe that a good mental health system must seek to empower individuals by providing insight and such coping mechanisms. Leaving Banksia, I was equipped with both of these, thanks to the numerous nurses, psychologists, psychiatrists and the people I met there. It was in meeting these people that I was empowered, inspired and re-invigorated. To these people that I had met in Banksia I owe a great debt of gratitude and thanks, not only for the insight I had gained in discussions with them, but also for their understanding, their compassion, and their friendship.
I resumed out-patient care at a Royal Children’s Hospital (RCH) outpatient clinic in Sunshine where I was treated mainly by a psychiatrist named Stephen. There was a period while I was being treated by him that I was considered for re-admission into Banksia, despite my undeclared objections. This did not eventuate and treatment at the outpatient clinic persisted until the time where my age prohibited me from continuing treatment at the RCH. I was discharged and arranged an interview with Orygen Youth Health, an organisation that could have taken me as a patient. In my consultation it was determined that my condition had improved significantly, and so my application was declined since Orygen had limited spaces for clients. I then resumed treatment with a psychiatrist in Sydenham who maintained my medication levels at a constant norm.
There seemed to be at this point a period of normality and order. I was able to engage my studies, to share relationships with other people and to enjoy my youth. However, this was not to last. First, my friends noticed, and then my family. I had relapsed into old habits and the spiral of anxiety reintensified to a noticeable degree. To me, it seemed as if the medication was beginning to have the opposite effect, or at least, I felt its side-effects impact my daily living. I was frequently fatigued and could not concentrate or adequately focus, which further compounded my frustration. At the recommendation of my family and friends, I saw another psychologist. This time locally.
Perfectionistic tendencies became apparent at this point. I began to view my worth, success and happiness as intimately and intrinsically linked to my performance and productivity, and thus I allocated copious portions of energy into self, at the expense of my relationships with others. I consistently evaluated, assessed and compared myself to others. A perpetual report card. Perfectionism, I realised, is ultimately destructive of one-self as it involves immense devotion of energy and resources into the self and ego, rather than in giving, to relationships and to reaching out and connecting with others. It can lead to self-absorption and valuing only the superficialities of status and notoriety, rather than considering a person’s innermost heart. I still struggle to overcome perfectionism.
Friendship with Ashleigh and my other friends has empowered me in many respects to attempt to overcome my OCD and my perfectionism. Ashleigh has always presented me with her unwavering support, even in times when my frustration lashed our ferociously against her. It is to my family and my friends that I owe my recovery, for their support, their understanding and their love. Thank-you all. In my times of despair and anxiety, you were there, you reached out to me, you connected with me on a personal level and gave me hope.
To all people who suffer from a mental affliction, there is hope. There is always hope. Sometimes we just need someone to show us that. A support network to sustain us in our times of despondency. Friends to lift us up when we are down. A fellow human being simply to reach out and touch one’s life. These the things that can help someone with a mental illness tread that worthwhile path of recovery. These are the things which give one hope in abundance.